To see the "Water for Elephants" actually encouraged me two things - nicely done, picturesque trailer and Christoph "Landa" Waltz in one of the major roles. I frightened away by Robert "Edward" Pattinson. I had the idea that in the moments when the screen will appear in the teen idol to close my eyes, but a little would prevent me to perceive the movie as it plays a major role Pattinson. However, have found that I like elephants, I decided that I think most of England and went. story: it is the son of Polish immigrants, a certain Jacob Jankowski, who dreams of becoming a veterinarian. So unfortunate that on his examination at the end of study parents were gracious to leave this vale of tears and despair (after the termination of the three points, all in Polish. dueciku The mother spoke only pure Polish, which led me to wonder whether it was really a problem employment for two lines of a Pole?), which makes Jacob moves in the world, depressed, lonely, and no idea of \u200b\u200blife. Puffs to a traveling circus in which starts throwing faeces of lions and ends up as a trainer of the new acquisition, it is słonicy Rosie. The acquisition was to be a gift from the director of the circus (Waltz), for his wife, trick (Witherspoon), but that turns out to be dumb as a shoe and resistant to dressage. Director played by Waltz is the mildest and most gentle man on earth, so elephant is slightly screwed, because the guy is fond of using a sharp rod. But no - it turns out that the Polish plague come everywhere. Pattinson discovers that the elephant understands Polish (Edzio pretending that he speaks Polish is one of the major emphases of this humorous movie.) And everything seems to fall into place, so that Jacob begins to think head and not his head and flies Marlene, wife of the director. And that, as mentioned, the director is not particularly forgiving, the atmosphere is getting tense.
I must admit that Pattinson pleasantly surprised me. No, he is not a good actor. But how do you not focus on the fact that intensive sparklić, it turns out pretty nice wood, not wood is not for viewing. Stiff like a stick is swallowed, but not particularly annoyed, and when it goes Nieporęt Pole (not with us the numbers, Bruner), is almost rozczulający. Witherspoon disappointing, pretty as a picture and acting chiefly as ornaments - a game without conviction. Between two main characters for my taste should feel the chemistry, naughty erotic tension (do not read books, do not know if it was really about it, perhaps had for the feeling of pure and innocent as a lily), and in the meantime if there words, the viewer would have a problem with noticing that something is happening (I invite those countries to the tutor to Laurie and Edelstein from "House MD"). Waltz is the best, but sometimes gives the impression of a little lost, though not quite know what there doing and what he wants from him. I preferred him in his role in Tarantino's Landy. Or maybe you just in the "Water for Elephants" is too indistinct. As a result, the best game for the elephant Rosie and her worth to choose the movie (it's almost not a joke).
I have a feeling that the director wanted to "Water for Elephants" to make an ambitious film full of momentum and something along the way did not work out. That means the momentum is like most, this film is the image of a very picturesque and aesthetically. The problem is that this ambition is very superficial, and from under her tenacity and painfully crawling Holiłud. The story is predictable and the ending obvious from the beginning (again, perhaps the fault of the book). I missed a very good, expressive music, which in this kind of film would be very useful, but for me it lasted an eternal silence.
Let there be no doubt - I left the theater rather amused, and even those sixteen gold does not regret. If you like Waltz, elephants and big cats, and at the same time not adjusted to a great experience, you can go see and play rather decently. It's just that "Water for Elephants" has the ambition to be great cinema, and with this a little over.
0 comments:
Post a Comment